Sante Messe in rito antico in Puglia

Visualizzazione post con etichetta S. Pietro Crisologo dottore della Chiesa. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta S. Pietro Crisologo dottore della Chiesa. Mostra tutti i post

venerdì 4 dicembre 2015

800° anniversario della chiusura del IV Concilio Lateranense (30 novembre 1215)

Il 30 novembre di 800 anni fa si chiudeva, di fatto, il famoso IV Concilio Lateranense, con l’approvazione in un sol giorno, durante la III sessione, di ben settanta decreti, che ripristinarono la sana e vera dottrina cattolica, rafforzarono la disciplina ecclesiastica e la pace nell’ordine sociale. Il concilio si concluse con la proposta del 14 dicembre 1215 di una nuova crociata in Terra Santa contro i musulmani: venne concessa l’indulgenza plenaria non solo a chi avesse combattuto, ma anche a quanti avessero solo finanziato le spedizioni. Innocenzo III morì pochi mesi dopo, pertanto la quinta crociata venne organizzata dal suo successore, Onorio III.
Questo sinodo generale fu voluto da papa Innocenzo III dei conti Segni sin dal 1213: era stato, infatti, convocato con la bolla Vineam Domini Sabaoth, emanata il 19 aprile 1213 (in PL 216, col. 823D-827A): «… inter omnia desiderabilia cordis nostri duo in hoc saeculo principaliter affectamus, ut ad recuperationem videlicet terrae sanctae ac reformationem universalis Ecclesiae valeamus intendere cum effectu: quorum utrumque tantam requirit provisionis instantiam ut absque gravi et grandi periculo ultra dissimulari nequeat vel differri. Unde supplicationes et lacrymas frequenter effudimus coram Deo, humiliter obsecrantes quatenus super iis suum nobis beneplacitum revelaret, inspiraret affectum, accenderet desiderium, et propositum confirmaret, facultatem et opportunitatem praestando ad ea salubriter exsequenda. Quapropter habito super iis cum fratribus nostris et aliis viris prudentibus frequenti ac diligenti tractatu, prout tanti sollicitudo propositi exigebat, hoc tandem ad exsequendum praedicta de ipsorum consilio providimus faciendum, ut quia haec universorum fidelium communem statum respiciunt, generale concilium iuxta priscam sanctorum Patrum consuetudinem convocemus propter lucra solummodo animarum opportuno tempore celebrandum: in quo ad exstirpanda vitia et plantandas virtutes, corrigendos excessus, et reformandos mores, eliminandas haereses, et roborandam fidem, sopiendas discordias, et stabiliendam pacem, comprimendas oppressiones, et libertatem fovendam, inducendos principes et populos Christianos ad succursum et subsidium terrae sanctae tam a clericis quam a laicis impendendum, cum caeteris quae longum esset per singula numerare, provide statuantur inviolabiliter observanda circa praelatos et subditos regulares et saeculares quaecunque de ipsius approbatione concilii visa fuerint expedire ad laudem et gloriam nominis eius, remedium et salutem animarum nostrarum, ac profectum et utilitatem populi Christiani».
Il Concilio fu aperto dal grande Pontefice l’11 novembre precedente e e fu lui stesso tenacemente a condurlo felicemente a termine. Si può dire che quest’evento segnò l’apice e senz’altro l’epoca d’oro della Chiesa cattolica durante tutto il Medioevo. Mai più, in seguito, fu toccato questo vertice.
Al Concilio prese parte un numero eccezionale di prelati (i patriarchi di Gerusalemme e Costantinopoli e i rappresentanti di quelli di Antiochia ed Alessandria, oltre 400 tra vescovi e arcivescovi, circa 900 tra abati e priori) e, cosa mai verificatasi in precedenza, i rappresentanti laici di Enrico, imperatore Latino d’Oriente, Federico II, sovrano del Sacro romano impero, quelli dei re di Francia, Aragona, Inghilterra, Ungheria, Gerusalemme e Cipro e dei Comuni lombardi. Ricorda, infatti, lo storico Girolamo Arnaldi: «“Alla antica maniera dei santi padri”, Innocenzo III aveva invitato al concilio i vescovi dell’Oriente e dell’Occidente, gli abati, i priori e anche fatto che costituiva una novità i capitoli delle chiese, nonché dei grandi Ordini religiosi (Cistercensi, Premostratensi, Ospitalieri, Templari) e i sovrani di tutta Europa. Vi presero parte quattrocentoquattro vescovi sia dell’intera Chiesa d’Occidente che della Chiesa latina d’Oriente, nonché un gran numero di abati, canonici e rappresentanti dei poteri secolari. Non vi partecipò nessun greco, benché invitato, oltre al patriarca dei Maroniti e un rappresentante del patriarca di Antiochia» (G. Arnaldi, Lateranense IV, Concilio, in Enciclopedia Federiciana, 2005).
Rileggere oggi quei provvedimenti può essere davvero istruttivo, vedendo quel che ancora ai nostri giorni essi possono dirci. La particolarità è che ci manca davvero un Pastore come fu Innocenzo III. Non a caso sotto di lui e la sua opera illuminata ebbero modo di nascere e svilupparsi gli ordini mendicanti di San Domenico, San Francesco e San Giovanni de Matha.
Nella memoria di S. Pietro Crisologo, vescovo, confessore e dottore della Chiesa, e di S. Barbara, vergine e martire, rilancio quest’articolo di Rorate caeli


Innocenzo III, Sacro Speco, Monastero, Subiaco

Tomba di Innocenzo III, Basilica di S. Giovanni in Laterano, Roma

Lavinia Fontana, Assunzione con i SS. Pietro Crisologo e Cassiano, 1583-84

Wilhelm Kalteysen von Aachen, Pala di S. Barbara con la Santa tra i SS. Felice ed Adautto, con scene della sua vita, 1447 circa, Muzeum Narodowe w Warszawie, Varsavia

Lucas Cranach il vecchio, Martirio di S. Barbara, 1510 circa, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 

Boëtius Adamsz. à Bolswert, S. Barbara, 1625-59, British Museum, Londra

Theodor van Thulden, Martirio di S. Barbara, 1633

Michael Willmann, Martirio di S. Barbara, 1680 circa

800th Anniversary of the Closing of the Fourth Lateran Council (November 30, 1215)

Marble bas relief by Joseph Kiselewski, 1950

On November 30, 1215, this day 800 years ago, the Fourth Lateran Council was formally closed by Pope Innocent III, who had opened it on November 11, and stood strongly behind its provisions. On this day seventy decrees were approved for the restoration of sound doctrine, the strengthening of ecclesiastical discipline, and peace in the civil order. It is a fascinating exercise to return to the decrees of this ecumenical council, therefore a council of the highest order of authority, and see what it has to say to us today.
The Confession of Faith with which the acts of the Council begin is one of the most exquisite documents of the Church’s Magisterium:
We firmly believe and simply confess that there is only one true God, eternal and immeasurable, almighty, unchangeable, incomprehensible and ineffable, Father, Son and Holy Spirit, three persons but one absolutely simple essence, substance or nature. The Father is from none, the Son from the Father alone, and the Holy Spirit from both equally, eternally without beginning or end; the Father generating, the Son being born, and the Holy Spirit proceeding; consubstantial and coequal, co-omnipotent and coeternal; one principle of all things, creator of all things invisible and visible, spiritual and corporeal; who by his almighty power at the beginning of time created from nothing both spiritual and corporeal creatures, that is to say angelic and earthly, and then created human beings composed as it were of both spirit and body in common. The devil and other demons were created by God naturally good, but they became evil by their own doing. Man, however, sinned at the prompting of the devil. This Holy Trinity, which is undivided according to its common essence but distinct according to the properties of its Persons, gave the teaching of salvation to the human race through Moses and the holy prophets and his other servants, according to the most appropriate disposition of the times. Finally the only-begotten Son of God, Jesus Christ, who became incarnate by the action of the whole Trinity in common and was conceived from the ever-virgin Mary through the cooperation of the Holy Spirit, having become true man, composed of a rational soul and human flesh, one person in two natures, showed more clearly the way of life. Although he is immortal and unable to suffer according to his divinity, he was made capable of suffering and dying according to his humanity. Indeed, having suffered and died on the wood of the cross for the salvation of the human race, he descended to the underworld, rose from the dead and ascended into heaven. He descended in the soul, rose in the flesh, and ascended in both. He will come at the end of time to judge the living and the dead, to render to every person according to his works, both to the reprobate and to the elect. All of them will rise with their own bodies, which they now wear, so as to receive according to their deserts, whether these be good or bad; for the latter perpetual punishment with the devil, for the former eternal glory with Christ. There is indeed one universal church of the faithful, outside of which nobody at all is saved, in which Jesus Christ is both priest and sacrifice. His body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the forms of bread and wine, the bread and wine having been changed in substance, by God’s power, into his body and blood, so that in order to achieve this mystery of unity we receive from God what he received from us. Nobody can effect this sacrament except a priest who has been properly ordained according to the church’s keys, which Jesus Christ himself gave to the apostles and their successors. But the sacrament of baptism is consecrated in water at the invocation of the undivided Trinity—namely Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—and brings salvation to both children and adults when it is correctly carried out by anyone in the form laid down by the church. If someone falls into sin after having received baptism, he or she can always be restored through true penitence. For not only virgins and the continent but also married persons find favour with God by right faith and good actions and deserve to attain to eternal blessedness.

Here are some excerpts from other decrees (see here for the full text of all the decrees).
Decree 3, On Heretics:
We excommunicate and anathematize every heresy raising itself up against this holy, orthodox and catholic faith which we have expounded above. We condemn all heretics, whatever names they may go under. They have different faces indeed but their tails are tied together inasmuch as they are alike in their pride. Let those condemned be handed over to the secular authorities present, or to their bailiffs, for due punishment. Clerics [guilty of heresy] are first to be degraded from their orders. The goods of the condemned are to be confiscated, if they are lay persons, and if clerics they are to be applied to the churches from which they received their stipends. … Let secular authorities, whatever offices they may be discharging, be advised and urged and if necessary be compelled by ecclesiastical censure, if they wish to be reputed and held to be faithful, to take publicly an oath for the defence of the faith to the effect that they will seek, in so far as they can, to expel from the lands subject to their jurisdiction all heretics designated by the church in good faith. … Catholics who take the cross and gird themselves up for the expulsion of heretics shall enjoy the same indulgence, and be strengthened by the same holy privilege, as is granted to those who go to the aid of the holy Land. Moreover, we determine to subject to excommunication believers who receive, defend or support heretics. … If, however, he [the heretic] is a cleric, let him be deposed from every office and benefice, so that the greater the fault the greater be the punishment. If any refuse to avoid such persons after they have been pointed out by the church, let them be punished with the sentence of excommunication until they make suitable satisfaction. Clerics should not, of course, give the sacraments of the church to such pestilent people nor give them a Christian burial nor accept alms or offerings from them; if they do, let them be deprived of their office and not restored to it without a special indult of the apostolic see. … We therefore will and command and, in virtue of obedience, strictly command that bishops see carefully to the effective execution of these things throughout their dioceses, if they wish to avoid canonical penalties. If any bishop is negligent or remiss in cleansing his diocese of the ferment of heresy, then when this shows itself by unmistakeable signs he shall be deposed from his office as bishop and there shall be put in his place a suitable person who both wishes and is able to overthrow the evil of heresy.

Decree 14, Clerical incontinence:
In order that the morals and conduct of clerics may be reformed for the better, let all of them strive to live in a continent and chaste way, especially those in holy orders. Let them beware of every vice involving lust, especially that on account of which the wrath of God came down from heaven upon the sons of disobedience [viz., sodomy], so that they may be worthy to minister in the sight of almighty God with a pure heart and an unsullied body. Lest the ease of receiving pardon prove an incentive to sin, we decree that those who are caught giving way to the vice of incontinence are to be punished according to canonical sanctions, in proportion to the seriousness of their sins. We order such sanctions to be effectively and strictly observed, in order that those whom the fear of God does not hold back from evil may at least be restrained from sin by temporal punishment. Therefore anyone who has been suspended for this reason and presumes to celebrate divine services, shall not only be deprived of his ecclesiastical benefices but shall also, on account of his twofold fault, be deposed in perpetuity. Prelates who dare to support such persons in their wickedness, especially if they do it for money or for some other temporal advantage, are to be subject to like punishment.

Decree 21, On yearly confession to one’s own priest, yearly communion, the confessional seal. (Note the assumption is not frequent communion for everyone, but communion for those who are prepared to receive reverently, in a state of grace.)
All the faithful of either sex, after they have reached the age of discernment, should individually confess all their sins in a faithful manner to their own priest at least once a year, and let them take care to do what they can to perform the penance imposed on them. Let them reverently receive the sacrament of the Eucharist at least at Easter unless they think, for a good reason and on the advice of their own priest, that they should abstain from receiving it for a time. Otherwise they shall be barred from entering a church during their lifetime and they shall be denied a Christian burial at death. Let this salutary decree be frequently published in churches, so that nobody may find the pretence of an excuse in the blindness of ignorance. … The priest [in the confessional] shall be discerning and prudent, so that like a skilled doctor he may pour wine and oil over the wounds of the injured one. Let him carefully inquire about the circumstances of both the sinner and the sin, so that he may prudently discern what sort of advice he ought to give and what remedy to apply, using various means to heal the sick person. …

Decree 26, Nominees for prelatures to be carefully screened:
There is nothing more harmful to God’s church than for unworthy prelates to be entrusted with the government of souls. Wishing therefore to provide the necessary remedy for this disease, we decree by this irrevocable constitution that when anyone has been entrusted with the government of souls, then he who holds the right to confirm him should diligently examine both the process of the election and the character of the person elected, so that when everything is in order he may confirm him. … Bishops too, if they wish to avoid canonical punishment, should take care to promote to holy orders and to ecclesiastical dignities men who will be able to discharge worthily the office entrusted to them. …

Decree 27, Candidates for the priesthood to be carefully trained and scrutinized:
To guide souls is a supreme art. We therefore strictly order bishops carefully to prepare those who are to be promoted to the priesthood and to instruct them, either by themselves or through other suitable persons, in the divine services and the sacraments of the church, so that they may be able to celebrate them correctly. But if they presume henceforth to ordain the ignorant and unformed, which can indeed easily be detected, we decree that both the ordainers and those ordained are to be subject to severe punishment. For it is preferable, especially in the ordination of priests, to have a few good ministers than many bad ones, for if a blind man leads another blind man, both will fall into the pit.

Decree 62, Regarding saint’s relics:
The Christian religion is frequently disparaged because certain people put saints’ relics up for sale and display them indiscriminately. In order that it may not be disparaged in the future, we ordain by this present decree that henceforth ancient relics shall not be displayed outside a reliquary or be put up for sale. As for newly discovered relics, let no one presume to venerate them publicly unless they have previously been approved by the authority of the Roman pontiff. Prelates, moreover, should not in future allow those who come to their churches, in order to venerate, to be deceived by lying stories or false documents, as has commonly happened in many places on account of the desire for profit. We also forbid the recognition of alms-collectors, some of whom deceive other people by proposing various errors in their preaching, unless they show authentic letters from the apostolic see or from the diocesan bishop. Even then they shall not be permitted to put before the people anything beyond what is contained in the letters. …

Decree 67, Jews and excessive usury:
The more the Christian religion is restrained from usurious practices, so much the more does the perfidy of the Jews grow in these matters, so that within a short time they are exhausting the resources of Christians. Wishing therefore to see that Christians are not savagely oppressed by Jews in this matter, we ordain by this synodal decree that if Jews in future, on any pretext, extort oppressive and excessive interest from Christians, then they are to be removed from contact with Christians until they have made adequate satisfaction for the immoderate burden. Christians too, if need be, shall be compelled by ecclesiastical censure, without the possibility of an appeal, to abstain from commerce with them. We enjoin upon princes not to be hostile to Christians on this account, but rather to be zealous in restraining Jews from so great oppression. …

Decree 70, Jewish converts may not retain their old rite:
Certain people who have come voluntarily to the waters of sacred baptism, as we learnt, do not wholly cast off the old man in order to put on the new more perfectly. For, in keeping remnants of their former rite, they upset the decorum of the Christian religion by such a mixing. Since it is written, cursed is he who enters the land by two paths, and a garment that is woven from linen and wool together should not be put on, we therefore decree that such people shall be wholly prevented by the prelates of churches from observing their old rite, so that those who freely offered themselves to the Christian religion may be kept to its observance by a salutary and necessary coercion. For it is a lesser evil not to know the Lord’s way than to go back on it after having known it.

Decree 71, Crusade to recover the Holy Land:
It is our ardent desire to liberate the holy Land from infidel hands. We therefore declare, with the approval of this sacred council and on the advice of prudent men who are fully aware of the circumstances of time and place, that crusaders are to make themselves ready so that all who have arranged to go by sea shall assemble in the kingdom of Sicily on 1 June after next—some as necessary and fitting at Brindisi and others at Messina and places neighbouring it on either side, where we too have arranged to be in person at that time, God willing, so that with our advice and help the Christian army may be in good order to set out with divine and apostolic blessing. Those who have decided to go by land should also take care to be ready by the same date. They shall notify us meanwhile so that we may grant them a suitable legate a latere for advice and help. Priests and other clerics who will be in the Christian army, both those under authority and prelates, shall diligently devote themselves to prayer and exhortation, teaching the crusaders by word and example to have the fear and love of God always before their eyes, so that they say or do nothing that might offend the divine majesty. If they ever fall into sin, let them quickly rise up again through true penitence. Let them be humble in heart and in body, keeping to moderation both in food and in dress, avoiding altogether dissensions and rivalries, and putting aside entirely any bitterness or envy, so that thus armed with spiritual and material weapons they may the more fearlessly fight against the enemies of the faith, relying not on their own power but rather trusting in the strength of God. We grant to these clerics that they may receive the fruits of their benefices in full for three years, as if they were resident in the churches, and if necessary they may leave them in pledge for the same time. … In order that nothing connected with this business of Jesus Christ be omitted, we will and order patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, abbots and others who have the care of souls to preach the cross zealously to those entrusted to them. Let them beseech kings, dukes, princes, margraves, counts, barons and other magnates, as well as the communities of cities, vills and towns—in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the one, only, true and eternal God—that those who do not go in person to the aid of the holy Land should contribute, according to their means, an appropriate number of fighting men together with their necessary expenses for three years, for the remission of their sins … We therefore, trusting in the mercy of almighty God and in the authority of the blessed apostles Peter and Paul, do grant, by the power of binding and loosing that God has conferred upon us, albeit unworthy, unto all those who undertake this work in person and at their own expense, full pardon for their sins about which they are heartily contrite and have spoken in confession, and we promise them an increase of eternal life at the recompensing of the just; also to those who do not go there in person but send suitable men at their own expense, according to their means and status, and likewise to those who go in person but at others’ expense, we grant full pardon for their sins. We wish and grant to share in this remission, according to the quality of their help and the intensity of their devotion, all who shall contribute suitably from their goods to the aid of the said Land or who give useful advice and help. Finally, this general synod imparts the benefit of its blessings to all who piously set out on this common enterprise in order that it may contribute worthily to their salvation.

(The beautiful bas relief of Pope Innocent III by sculptor Joseph Kiselewski is part of a series of 23 marble relief portraits, by various artists, of famous lawgivers placed over the gallery doors of the Chamber of the House of Representatives in Washington, D.C., installed in 1949-1950. It says something about the 1940s that Pope Innocent III could be chosen, by the American secular government, as one of the great figures in the history of law, under whose gaze the U.S. representatives are to undertake their work. See here for more information.)

giovedì 4 dicembre 2014

SS. Pietro Crisologo, vescovo, confessore e dottore della Chiesa, e Barbara, vergine e martire

La festa di due santi ricorre oggi.
La prima è quella del celebre vescovo di Ravenna, morto il 2 dicembre verso l’anno 450, san Pietro Crisologo, la quale era penetrata da molto nella liturgia romana quando Benedetto XIII l’elevò al rito doppio, per onorare soprattutto il titolo di Dottore della Chiesa universale attribuito al Santo odierno fin dall’antichità. Di fatto, conviene che la Chiesa romana, nella sua liturgia d’Avvento, riservi un posto di onore a colui che, consacrato vescovo a Roma, lavorò molto con san Leone Magno, affinché i Padri di Calcedonia distinguessero, nell’unità di persona, la doppia natura, divina ed umana, del Verbo incarnato, e che così fosse condannato l’errore di Eutiche. Ricordiamo queste celebri parole di san Pietro Crisologo, indirizzate ad Eutiche, che aveva sollecitato la sua benevolenza: «... Quoniam beatus Petrus, qui in propria sede et vivit et præsidet, præstat quærentibus fidei veritatem. Nos enim pro studio pacis et fidei, extra consensum Romanæ civitatis episcopi, causas fidei audire non possumus» (San Pietro Crisologo, Epist. XXV, Ad Eutychem Presbyterum, in PL 54, col. 743A).
La liturgia tradizionale di questo giorno, e segnatamente la preghiera-colletta, di redazione abbastanza recente, sebbene la sua trama primitiva sia antica, dimostra come il suo compilatore, tutto preoccupato della storia, abbia voluto inserire, tra l’altro, un’allusione alla visione che ebbe il Papa prima dell’ordinazione episcopale del Crisologo («Deus, qui beátum Petrum Chrysólogum Doctorem egrégium, divínitus præmonstrátum, ad regéndam et instruéndam Ecclésiam tuam éligi voluísti »). L’episodio è narrato da Andrea Agnello nel Liber Pontificalis, nella Vita S. Petri Chrysologi Ravennatis Archiepiscopi, in PL 52, col. 13C ss., partic. col. 16B: il papa Sisto III avrebbe visto in sogno, in effetti, la notte prima dell’ordinazione episcopale del nostro Santo, san Pietro apostolo e sant’Apollinare, i quali avrebbero chiesto di eleggere come vescovo di Ravenna il diacono imolese Pietro Crisologo e non altri («Igitur nocte eadem apparuit ad sanctum Sixtum urbis Romæ episcopum per visionem B. apostolus Christi claviger Petrus, una cum Apollinare discipulo suo, et inter ambo stans B. Petrus Chrysologus; et parum B. Petrus apostolus pedem figens dixit ad S. Papam Sixtum: Vide hunc virum, quem elegemus nos, qui stat in medium nostrorum, ipsum consecra, non alium. Idcirco expergefactus papa, jussit valde introduci diluculo plebem universam, et virum qui ordinandus erat. ...»; «Durante la notte al santo Sisto, vescovo di Roma, apparve in visione il beato apostolo Pietro, clavigero di Cristo, insieme col suo discepolo Apollinare e in mezzo a loro stava il beato Pietro Crisologo; avvicinandosi un poco il beato apostolo Pietro disse al santo papa Sisto: “Osserva l’uomo che sta in mezzo a noi e che noi abbiamo eletto: consacra questo e non un altro”. Perciò il papa, destatosi, subito di buon mattino ordinò che fosse introdotta tutta la gente con l’uomo che doveva essere consacrato»).
Concludiamo il ricordo del nostro Santo, rammentando una sua celebre parola, pronunciata un tempo davanti ai frivoli abitanti di Ravenna suoi contemporanei: «qui jocari voluerit cum diabolo, non poterit gaudere cum Christo. Nemo cum serpente securus ludit, nemo cum diabolo jocatur impune»; «Coloro che vogliono divertirsi col demonio, non possono gioire con Cristo» (San Pietro Crisologo, Sermo CLV, De kalendis Januarii, quæ varia gentium superstitione polluebantur, in PL 52, col. 611B). Divertirsi con il diavolo significa seguire le pompe, le mode, la lussuria e la leggerezza dei mondani, che ci impedisce di prendere la nostra croce per seguire Gesù Cristo. Questi uomini, come dice l’Apostolo, sono i nemici della Croce del Cristo ed il loro fine, se non si pentono, sarà la morte e la dannazione eterna.
L’altra figura di santità odierna è quella di santa Barbara.
Prima che la festa di san Francesco Saverio, fissata al 3 dicembre, rinviasse la solennità di san Pietro Crisologo all’indomani, questo giorno era dedicato solo alla celebre martire orientale (probabilmente di Eliopoli, in Fenicia). La sua festa è stata accolta nel calendario romano almeno dal XII sec.; il suo culto a Roma è tuttavia molto più antico, poiché Gregorio Magno, Leone IV, Stefano III ed altri papi dell’Alto Medioevo gli dedicarono delle basiliche e degli oratori al Clivus scauri (cfr. Mariano Armellini, Le chiese di Roma dal secolo IV al XIX, Tipografia Vaticana, Roma 18912, pp. 515-516, il quale ricorda che si trattava di una cappella dedicata ai santi Andrea, Silvia e Barbara), vicino al titolo dei Quattro Coronati (ibidem, p. 501; Ch. Huelsen, Le Chiese di Roma nel medio evo, Firenze 1927, p. 57), vicino alla chiesa di San Lorenzo in Agro Verano, vicino al teatro di Pompeo (ibidem, pp. 204-205), nel quartiere della Suburra (Armellini, op. cit., p. 222; Huelsen, op. cit., p. 205), ed altri ancora (tra queste esiste ancora la chiesa di Santa Barbara dei Librai o alla Regola, nella via dei Giubbonari. Cfr. Armellini, op. cit., pp. 410-411). Una chiesa moderna, costruita nel 1953, e dedicata alla Santa esiste nel quartiere Appio Claudio.
Il culto della Martire fu verosimilmente importato dai Bizantini e, da Roma, si diffuse in altre parti d’Italia, soprattutto a Rieti, la cui Cattedrale, in un’apposita cappella progettata dal Bernini, si fregia di possedere insigni reliquie della Santa.
Giovanni Diacono, nella sua vita di san Gregorio Magno, ci informa che essendo ancora monaco ed abate del monastero di Sant’Andrea, in oratorio sanctæ Barbaræ ... Gregorius laudes Domino celebrare solebat (Giovanni Diacono, Vita Sancti Gregorii Magni libri Quattuor, lib. IV, § 89, in PL 75, col. 234B).
Di conseguenza, il culto di santa Barbara a Roma datava almeno alla fine del VI sec.
Quasi tutti gli orientali celebrano in questo giorno la festa di santa Barbara, alla quale i bizantini danno anche il titolo di Βαρβάρας μεγαλομάρτυρος (Αγίας Βαρβάρας της Μεγαλομάρτυρος). L’autenticità dei suoi Atti non è sicura, ma alla gloria dei fasti ecclesiastici è sufficiente l’eroica confessione della fede affermata dinanzi ai tormenti e sigillata col sangue. È il caso di ripetere dopo sant’Ambrogio (il quale si riferiva a sant’Agnese), Martyrem dixi, prædicavi satis (Sant’Ambrogio, De Virginibus libri tres, lib. I, cap. II, § 6, in PL 16, 190A (ed. 1880, col. 200B). L’edizione del Migne riporta nel testo la seguente variante: «Appellabo martyrem, prædicabo virginem»).


Andrea Lilio, Compianto sul Cristo morto con i SS. Pietro Crisologo, Girolamo, Maddalena, Francesco d'Assisi, Giovanni Battista e Bartolomeo, 1596, Chiesa dei Cappuccini, Bagnocavallo 


Scuola guerninesca, S. Pietro Crisologo, XVII sec., Museo diocesano, Imola

Gian Andrea Fornioni, S. Pietro Crisologo, 1752, Museo diocesano, Imola

Scuola bolognese, S. Pietro Crisologo, XVIII sec., Museo diocesano, Imola

Ambito imolese, S. Pietro Crisologo, XVIII sec., Museo diocesano, Imola





Francisco Goya y Lucientes, S. Barbara, 1773 circa, Museo del Prado, Madrid

Guercino, S. Barbara, 1659


Palma il Vecchio, S. Barbara, 1524-25, Chiesa di S. Maria Formosa, Venezia

Parmigianino, S. Barbara, 1522, Museo del Prado, Madrid

Maestro di Becerril, S. Barbara, 1520 circa, Museo del Prado, Madrid

Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio, S. Barbara, 1493-99, Staatliche Museen, Berlino